4 comments

  • byzantinegene 22 minutes ago

    https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/xwfb/xwfyrth/art/2026/art_d7661dbf...

    "Second, we encourage open source, open collaboration, and resource sharing. The Chinese government is committed to making artificial intelligence a significant driving force for promoting common prosperity and safeguarding common security. To support the construction of an open source innovation ecosystem for artificial intelligence, convenient measures such as automatic licensing will be applied to technology exports involving open source AI technologies, Chinese companies building and operating their own computing centers overseas, conducting chip fabrication overseas, utilizing overseas resources for joint research and development, and participating in the formulation of international standards, basically achieving "immediate reporting and export." Technologies that have already entered the public domain through open source or published academic papers will not be included in the export management scope, creating a favorable environment for international exchange and cooperation in artificial intelligence technology."

    their official stance suggests they remain in support of open-weights

  • _fw 34 minutes ago

    I understand why China wants to restrict exports of their models.

    But I feel the only reason Chinese models have been able to gain such popularity is BECAUSE they are open source.

    I wouldn’t trust models from China enough to use them in important work unless they were open.

    Restricting any powerful Chinese model [that ranks in the global top 10] is going to make them very difficult to advocate for, and very hard for global users to adopt.

    Feels like this could be the beginning of the end of the democratisation of powerful AI.

    And yes, I appreciate the irony that Chinese models have been the ones enabling that democratisation!

      vkou 30 minutes ago

      I agree - some parts of this seem very much like a footgun.

  • swiftcoder 11 minutes ago

    These rules are not new, right? They appear to match the previous guidance (restrictions on top-10 models, exemption for open-source collaboration)