9 comments

  • voakbasda 29 minutes ago

    So if they no longer have a contract, how is it legal for Flock to continue to use the allocated resources? Why not hit them with theft of service for continuing to draw power and use public infrastructure?

    They will never change their behavior when there are no consequences for their actions.

      blooalien 19 minutes ago

      > So if they no longer have a contract, how is it legal for Flock to continue to use the allocated resources?

      They've even been caught putting them back up or re-enabling them in places where the contract has been canceled. How is that legal? I thought you had to be city-approved to install equipment like that. One would think that no contract = no approval?

      Maybe they need to set up a "sting" operation at one of the disabled units and start makin' some arrests/fines for unapproved equipment installation/construction on public property? See if that changes some minds over at Flock about what they can and cannot get away with?

      porkshoe 3 minutes ago

      American laws don't apply to billionaires or corporations.

  • Papazsazsa 25 minutes ago

    One of the most compelling aspects of American governance is the latitude local law enforcement has. They can be both an ally and enemy to freedom.

      dmos62 19 minutes ago

      Are they elected?

        Loughla 14 minutes ago

        Depends on the type of police. Sheriff's are, I know. But I'm pretty sure city chiefs and state chiefs are just appointed by other elected officials. So I guess one step removed?

        andsoitis 5 minutes ago

        [dead]

  • bluecollarworke 38 minutes ago

    Gee, with vendors like this, who needs criminals?

      analog31 25 minutes ago

      At least the cameras make it easy to track the criminals down... to the location of the cameras.