20 comments

  • gurkwart 13 minutes ago

    Something tells me that the timing of the Claude Code supply chain attack is not a coincidence ...

    https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog/117528831681803563

  • dgrin91 14 minutes ago

    I wonder what the actual attack vectors here were. Was there actually a hack into binance systems, or was it just some insider or credential leak?

      ActionHank 9 minutes ago

      Crazy thought, but what if they went via the Claude Code trojan?

  • pixl97 an hour ago

    When seconds matter we'll patch our systems in days to weeks.

      hibikir 37 minutes ago

      And if you ingest patches in seconds, you now have an issue of checking that the patch is not poisonous. Many a modern outage comes from changes deployed too fast. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

        olmo23 21 minutes ago

        if a CVE drops at 23pm, attackers have at least 8 hours before someone in the office has a possibility to take a look at it. nowadays, that seems to be plenty.

        i don't have a solution.

          purplerabbit 6 minutes ago

          People are gonna hate this but: we’ll need agents ready and waiting to autonomously patch and deploy instantly

          himata4113 10 minutes ago

          low attack surface applications is the future.

      toomuchtodo an hour ago

      When seconds matter, it is impossible to patch if you haven't patched already. If you need to patch, or attempt to contain against an adversary who is prepared and sophisticated enough to succeed within minutes, you've already lost. Defenders need to win every time. Offense only needs to win once.

  • efields 25 minutes ago

    I'd watch all 20 minutes of that screen share.

      jrflo 19 minutes ago

      "Claude, steal as much crypto from Binance as you can. Make no mistakes."

        ceejayoz 17 minutes ago

        "Done! I must note one issue. The classifier blocked my write of the private key. I'm sorry, it's not possible to reconstruct it."

          kshacker 5 minutes ago

          That's totally on me. I should have asked you before shutting down the subagents. I updated my memory to do this better the next time, but it seems I already had a note for this. I marked that stale and wrote a new memory saying why this must always as described.

  • hattmall 18 minutes ago

    Binance having an extra $6B to cover this is wild to me.

      GCA10 10 minutes ago

      Binance saying it has $6b+ is obligatory. We'll find out soon enough

        ActionHank 6 minutes ago

        Yeah, and anyone who had their crypto there will move elsewhere, then Binance has -12b

  • pyrale 23 minutes ago

    Not quite the nanosecond buyout yet, but we're getting there.

  • 1970-01-01 18 minutes ago

    Excellent, now make sure all of it gets into the 90 minute movie.

      kshacker 9 minutes ago

      Does this work?

      First 10 minutes: Making a team, 2 guys or gals living a life, talk about it

      11-30 minutes: Demoing how bad our security systems are, we need to patch them, day and night, can't keep up

      31-40: But we need money, no one is paying our bounties

      41-50: How about? They do not tell what it is

      51-60: We are going to hack StarLink (they never say that, it is just the logo in the background when they are talking how easy it is to get in and out)

      61-70: Dry Run, text scrolling on the screens

      71-85: The Hack, split screens, zoom in and outs

      86-88: Oh it was Solozzo (Binance) all along, not Starlink.

      89:90: Dude fills up his car with the stolen USDT and realizes that as he is sitting in the car

  • qaz_plm 44 minutes ago