52 comments

  • torvald 20 minutes ago

    From what I've gathered, this is the plan for all EU countries as well. But the pandemic has stalled the overall process.

    https://jp.ibtimes.com/eu-clock-change-plan-stalled-104949

      w3ll_w3ll_w3ll 17 minutes ago

      In EU it's currently stalled because some countries want to stay permanently on their DST time (south europe) and others (north europe) want to stay on their solar time.

      It's better to make a common decison about this, so we are stalled.

        mcv 8 minutes ago

        It's weird to standardise on summer time instead of standard time. It moves you one timezone to the east. And in western Europe, a lot of countries are already on central European time. Permanent summertime would put them on eastern European time, same as Kyiv. In winter the sun wouldn't come up until 9:30.

          matwood a minute ago

          Maybe I’m an outlier, but I’d rather it stay light later. Sunset at 16:30 in the winter is horrible and depressing IMO.

          LluisGerard 3 minutes ago

          In Spain most people I talk to want permanent summertime because they like having sun late at the evening during summer, and they can't stand it when in winter the sun sets at 17:00. I think the issue is that a lot of offices work from 9:00 to 13:00 and 15:00 to 19:00. I remember when working on an office in Barcelona and having to drive 1 hour. I would leave home in darkness and drive back home in darkness.

          stavros 3 minutes ago

          And it would also set later, which is my personal preference as a Greek.

        lgrebe 3 minutes ago

        I dont see how having multiple timezones in europe would be disadvantageous.

          4thguy a minute ago

          Exactly. It's not like there aren't multiple timezones in Europe already

        not-kinsale-joe 3 minutes ago

        I think there is also an issue with Ireland needing to stay in the same time zone as Northern Ireland.

  • Svip 28 minutes ago

    This articles mentions that Cuba tried permanent DST in 2004-06. This makes me wonder, has anyone ever tried permanent DST and not given up? I know Russia attempted in 2011-2013[1] (before switching to permanent standard time), and the US did it in 1974[2] before going back. I know British Columbia did it this year, but I wonder how long that will last. BC is pretty North, and I wonder how local Canadians will feel about the very dark mornings in winter.

    [1] https://timeinrussia.com/daylight-saving-russia/ [2] https://www.newsweek.com/the-us-tried-permanent-daylight-sav...

      dubcanada 8 minutes ago

      Mornings are still dark doesn't really matter

  • therealfigtree 16 minutes ago

    I'm curious how disruptive this would be from a database perspective ? For eg, All the flight bookings to/from Cuba needs to be updated because it would have originally accounted for DST.

  • gvieri 29 minutes ago

    I really hope that Italy will follow... Every single time adjustment (or jet lag) is a drama for me.

      Heliosmaster 26 minutes ago

      Fwiw last week my and my family kept our clocks in CEST. My son sleeps an hour longer in the morning. But we go to bed before 21. Aiuto!

        mystifyingpoi 17 minutes ago

        I hate DST switching, and since last 3 days I've tried to live as if DST didn't happen, go to sleep super early etc.

        It completely fails when you account for everyone else around you. Could work if you live alone with flexible working hours. But having a semi-active social life and kids makes it impossible.

  • wafflemaker 33 minutes ago

    If they still move time back in spring, they will gain 1h per person.

    If they keep doing it indefinitely, they're looking at some serious profits and boost to GDP.

      vasco 19 minutes ago

      This is Cuba we're talking about. Profits only matter if they go to the ruling family and friends.

        berkes 11 minutes ago

        That's unnecessary political stereotyping.

        But what does matter in Cuba, is Savings.

        The country is in shambles, beyond bankruptcy, in cases literally starving. Because of it"international" sanctions. Severe shortages of petrol, water and energy.

        So it wouldn't be surprising if, by moving the clock every year in just one direction, petrol, water and electricity is saved. And it wouldn't even be suprising if that actually happens.

          stavros a minute ago

          It's not stereotyping when it can be applied to basically every country in the world, including the US.

  • dsign 9 minutes ago

    Does anybody what's the status with solar power there? Seems like the country would have plenty of sun to use. I know that some private people in the island are running almost 24x7 on solar and batteries, but most private people, companies and specially the government are still in blackout.

  • tomkarho 4 minutes ago

    Good for them. Hope that shames the rest of the world (looking at you EU) to action too.

  • RandomSwedish 10 minutes ago

    God, I would love if the EU actually got going with it.

  • aussieguy1234 3 minutes ago

    This makes sense given all of the power outages largely caused by U.S. sanctions. You would in this scenario want to have more daylight extending into the night time hours.

  • timonoko 13 minutes ago

    I have totally solved all issues. I have additional pointer on my watchface for the true position of the sun. https://photos.app.goo.gl/M95bW4XWR2NDUup46

  • phgn 39 minutes ago

    Nice! I don't really care if we end up on daylight savings or not, just stop this time change madness finally please!

      Boltgolt 30 minutes ago

      If you read the article it's the worst of both worlds: Keep clock time the same but start work and school 30 minutes later?

        genxy 18 minutes ago

        Shouldn't we just get up when the sun comes up? And if you can't see the sun, everyone can stay home.

      ssl-3 35 minutes ago

      This is the only reasonable and measured take.

      (Unfortunately, it always gets derailed by highly-polarized discussions about whether to stay on DST forever or get rid of it forever. They'll be showing up here again soon enough.)

        oddIdentities 30 minutes ago

        It is a reasonable take but it is not the _only_ one - I think it is arguably more reasonable to transition away from DST to ordinary "best TZ granularity approximation to zenith-occurs-at-noon" time once, and then stay (and manage) that time over the millenia to come.

          ssl-3 11 minutes ago

          I like this idea. I like it quite a lot.

          But can we... uh... can we keep that as some kind of tertiary issue to solve later after we successfully stop screwing up the clocks twice every year? We don't really need to build a singular omnibus clock overhaul that will most assuredly never come to fruition, do we? :)

      mhd 21 minutes ago

      Swatch Beat time.

  • boonzeet 38 minutes ago

    40 odd lines just for handling Cuba alone, amazing

  • throwaway27448 20 minutes ago

    I don't understand the obsession with keeping the perfectly vertical sun at noon given we all work from dark to dark under winter time. What would actually help us experience daylight would NOT be moving the clocks or moving work an hour earlier or a few hours later

  • thendrill 40 minutes ago

    So... Cuba is the voice of reason?

    Yehh Europe is loosing its mind..

    I belive this whole clock fliopity flip twice a year is a huge contributing factor to people's "unbalance", and worsening mental state... Especially the northern parts....

    We humans are creatures of habit... Mess with the circadian rhythm of en entire population and expect no adverse effect.... Mhm checks out.

      marliechiller 4 minutes ago

      I remember reading somewhere that we see an increased incidence of heart related ailments around the clock change, hypothesized due to this change in sleep patterns.

      Boltgolt 37 minutes ago

      Calling canceling a time change mere days before it was going to happen "the voice of reason" is rich

        lloeki 34 minutes ago

        "Days" is plenty of time, IIRC some tz changes happened hours before they had to come into effect!

      sschueller 18 minutes ago
      jansan 32 minutes ago

      The EU again is all talk and no action on this topic. 84% said in a poll to get rid of it back in 2018, parliament voted to end it by 2021. But here we are at the end of 2026 turning the clocks back again. Next march same thing. Honestly at this point I don't think it will ever happen, they will still be "discussing"it in 2040.

      echoangle 31 minutes ago

      > and worsening mental state

      How would something that has been in effect for at least 60 years still lead to a worsening mental state over time?

        wiseowise 13 minutes ago

        Yeah, because humans existed for only 60 years.

          echoangle 10 minutes ago

          Well most people haven't existed for 60 years. Where I'm from, DST was introduced 110 years ago and people still complain. When will the worsening mental state reach equilibrium? Or is there maybe a chance that the worsening mental state isn't due to DST?

  • OsrsNeedsf2P an hour ago

    manually rolled datetime library screams

  • zombot 41 minutes ago

    WTF. They should abolish DST.

      F3nd0 40 minutes ago

      Why?

        mrweasel 26 minutes ago

        I don't know it this will be the case for Cuba, as it's somewhat differently placed on the map, but Russia tried DST only and had to switch to standard time and then stayed there.

        Some people absolutely loves DST for some reason, but it creates stress and mental problems for people, especially in the north. The long mornings are somehow worse than the short evenings. Technically it shouldn't matter what the clock shows, but when society insists on things happening at a certain time, whether or not the sun is out becomes important.

        For the Russian case see: https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-28423647

        oddIdentities 33 minutes ago

        Because DST is the wrong time; if you look at the legal implementation of DST, most countries carve out exceptions for fields where lying about the time can obviously lead to death and destruction - navigation being perhaps the main one.

        What everyone missed is that DST could itself lead to much greater loss of life than we might have lost had the use of DST been mandated all the way through to e.g. large naval, air or spacecraft.

        And as research into DST continues, this seems to have been not merely an abstract possibility was missed, but _the actual outcome_. DST is quite literally killing people by the thousands.