7 comments

  • 2001zhaozhao 9 minutes ago

    I actually don't see any reason why I would use this instead of my Xreal Air (released like 3 years ago) + Samsung Dex. The phone is a perfect "compute puck" for wired AR glasses and Google even makes them, so why the heck are they selling separate compute pucks with these glasses and making them unaffordable?? Just make some pixel glasses that run android xr on the pixel phone instead

      jayd16 a minute ago

      Those are 3DOF head tracking, right? This is inside-out tracked, 6DOF and hand tracking.

      ranger_danger a minute ago

      In my case I would need the puck if I'm out and about because my phone does not support DP Alt Mode.

  • vdfs 7 minutes ago

    I wonder when it will join the graveyard?

  • AuthAuth 44 minutes ago

    This is cool. Its part of an ideal version of my home setup. But god the marketing feels so off, its like its made by people who have never used a monitor or done work on a computer. The marketing makes it out to be a phone screen for your face which is such a sad vision for genuinely cool technology. Also horrible demonstration of AI do these people even use AI?

    The part where he asked AI to organise his windows was almost as painful as the part where he was in a generic chase sequence of a Ubisoft slop game and asked whats the best way to catch the assassin.

  • classictraffic an hour ago

    $1099 is so nuts

      ranger_danger 7 minutes ago

      If you just want a "dumb" pair of wired display glasses, they have a $300 version (xbx a01+) that has no brick, no Android and no AI, it operates as a plain DP Alt Mode USB-C connection.

      I like mine, they are more usable as a work monitor than I thought they would be (I'm used to blurry VR sets but these are sharp except for the extreme edges). The FOV is not quite as wide as the new XR ones but I'm ok with that... I don't use them for any immersive effect.