Not a legal expert, but that sounds like a trojan horse. Does this mean if a bad actor were to use Meta's model, that if they bypass the safegaurds that they get off scot-free?
>The proposed language said, “AI features may make mistakes and may not always produce accurate, complete, or suitable results,” and customers “are solely responsible for and assume any and all risks associated with such AI features and any resulting content.”
How about as a society we just start throwing people who work at meta into federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison until they get the message. From the top down.
Not a legal expert, but that sounds like a trojan horse. Does this mean if a bad actor were to use Meta's model, that if they bypass the safegaurds that they get off scot-free?
Related: please see Edward Snowden's latest talk. This whole liability shifting has become a tragedy that we must stop. For humanity's sake.
>The proposed language said, “AI features may make mistakes and may not always produce accurate, complete, or suitable results,” and customers “are solely responsible for and assume any and all risks associated with such AI features and any resulting content.”
How about as a society we just start throwing people who work at meta into federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison until they get the message. From the top down.