Only if the buck can run them down, when they can afford to outrun every worker between the buck and being held accountable for their decisions. Meta’s attempting to claim that leadership did not wield management authority to have torrenting occur because if the company is just operated by adhoc cowboy devops, then management is never held liable for mismanagement.
Going to go out on a limb here, but isn't one of the generally understood justifications for exec pay being so high is that the buck stops with them?
Only if the buck can run them down, when they can afford to outrun every worker between the buck and being held accountable for their decisions. Meta’s attempting to claim that leadership did not wield management authority to have torrenting occur because if the company is just operated by adhoc cowboy devops, then management is never held liable for mismanagement.
Classic CEO behavior