4 comments

  • A_D_E_P_T an hour ago

    The Google models are great "general purpose" and research LLMs, but they're relatively poor at coding.

    The way I see it, you have two options.

    1) Get on the Claude Max 20x plan and use Opus 5.5 for review/orchestration and Haiku 5.5 for grunt work. Haiku 5.5 is decent, cheap, and fast.

    2) Deepseek 4.1 Flash in OpenCode.

    You should also test MiMo v2.6. It's a little bit uneven, but might work well for whatever you're trying to do, and it's also cheap.

      anoojb 37 minutes ago

      Can you share more about what makes them poor at coding? I haven't tried Google models, but I'm curious what issues you hit?

      Yeah, having review/orchestration + subagents seems like the stndard way to optimize for cost/performnce.

      Using OpenCode has been on the list to try. Logically, the value of a bundle from a larger company should technically beat out a smaller purveyor of open-weight models right? I also wonder how much OpenCode's token/sec throttling will impact my productivity?

  • prologic an hour ago

    Honestly. Just buy the Claude Prox 5x plan. it works great.

      anoojb an hour ago

      I've heard that folks using using a mid-tier Anthropic model like Sonnet 5.5 easily run into limits. When I use GitHub Copilot (for work) with Anthropic models I can easily rack up quite a significant bill.

      This is why I'm comparing value for the money.

      While Google may not have the "best" models, what's the point if you hit a wall with Claude Code? The extra baseline quota with Anti-gravity could be worth it.