10 points | by Tomte an hour ago
2 comments
TLDR: Starbucks are using the term "Sugar-Free" when they mean “no added sugar” although there's sugar naturally in the ingredients.
I'm not sure how anyone can argue that isn't clearly breaking FDA guidance of containing less than 0.5g of sugar:
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidan...
I’m trying to visualize the argument made that this was okay. I can’t.
TLDR: Starbucks are using the term "Sugar-Free" when they mean “no added sugar” although there's sugar naturally in the ingredients.
I'm not sure how anyone can argue that isn't clearly breaking FDA guidance of containing less than 0.5g of sugar:
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidan...
I’m trying to visualize the argument made that this was okay. I can’t.