39 comments

  • fifilura 44 minutes ago

    "Existing investors including Sequoia, Lightspeed, Greenfield, Kindred, Lingotto and Promus Ventures participated alongside new backers Cherry Ventures and European Tech Collective."

    What share of the investor money is from USA?

  • trolleski 38 minutes ago

    Ain't that a kick in the head?

  • amelius 18 minutes ago

    What is the SOTA in AI for robotics today? Is there much progress? Or is everybody too much focused on the LLMs now?

  • Rebuff5007 40 minutes ago

    > Robotics-as-a-Service model

    Oof. Amazed that venture-backed robotics companies are still interested in making this work.

      skrebbel 27 minutes ago

      Why not? Huge companies like Schlumberger work on a similar model. I mean these are not AI businesses (yet) but commercially the model is the same: develop gear in house and rent it out together with the specialists who operate it.

      dachworker 10 minutes ago

      Huh? I thought that was their entire selling point. That you can have a factory that needs retooling and instead of having to carefully plan and buy robots yourself, you can hire these guys instead.

      inglor_cz 15 minutes ago

      Imagine a robot bricklayer. Some big construction companies may buy them outright, but for smaller projects, it makes sense to simply rent them.

        someonebaggy 3 minutes ago

        aaS means you don't even rent them, you just pay someone to come and lay a certain number of bricks by any means necessary.

        crote 6 minutes ago

        Those have existed for quite a while now. For smaller projects it is cheaper to get a human.

  • igleria an hour ago

    what is it with people choosing evil corpo names

      Findecanor 38 minutes ago

      Indeed. The name was well established in the popular Fallout game series before this company was founded.

      SillyUsername 33 minutes ago

      The fact a defence company is also called Stark is quite amusing, if not for the deadly weapons.

      someonebaggy 11 minutes ago

      Evil often wins and makes a lot of money. Also effective if your target audience is evil billionaires with brain rot.

      this one doesn't sound that evil though? Just a simple portmanteau that may not sound as stupid in German?

      airstrike 36 minutes ago

      Effective in this attention economy.

      Eyerolling to anyone with half a brain.

      But maybe most people don't have half a brain.

  • mertbio 30 minutes ago

    The comments here are just another reminder of how US-centric HN has become. Whenever there's positive news from Germany or elsewhere in Europe, people are quick to dismiss it. But the moment there's negative news, everyone jumps on the bandwagon to bash it.

      kroyblen 22 minutes ago

      Well, it seems their fastest growing market (and largest?) is in the USA.

      They, per the article, have set up manufacturing there and a research lab in SF.

      The co-founder has also relocated to the USA.

      Much of the dismissal I think doesn’t come from a bad place - people see potential in europe, why can’t we be a similar market?

      philipallstar 13 minutes ago

      Who is dismissing it?

      vrganj 28 minutes ago

      People here work in the US tech bubble. The behavior you describe is indicative of fear.

        tsak 25 minutes ago

        news.ycombinator.eu

        SCNR

  • ramesh31 17 minutes ago

    Isn't the $1B unicorn number from like 2015? I feel like that's a pretty typical series A/B valuation at this point.

      speed_spread 12 minutes ago

      For Silicon Valley, maybe. But this is Europe, where things are still rooted in reality.

  • tonyhart7 32 minutes ago

    so the website is basically called it physical AI

  • jdkfofofo an hour ago

    Hype for the inevitable NYSE IPO!

      vrganj an hour ago

      Capital Markets union is coming :-)

  • rusk an hour ago

    Cries in dystopian

      7speter an hour ago

      Just as long as the CEO’s name isn’t Robert House, I guess

  • askl an hour ago

    I was expecting to be disappointed at seeing another humanoid robot that can fold laundry BS startup.

    But it looks like they're trying to build something that is actually useful.

      dachworker 7 minutes ago

      I just found out about them. To me it seems their core product is "boring" industrial robots with some AI fluff on top, which imho is smart because you can capaitalize on the hype without having it be pivotal to their entire business model. What I find interesting is the robot-as-a-service model.

      skrebbel 23 minutes ago

      I assume you got a spouse or parent do all the laundry for you? I’m not sure you realize how spoiled you sound.

      Seriously a laundry folding robot excites me much more than a CLI that can generate code. I enjoy generating code myself! I don’t enjoy laundry. Total killer app.

        askl 9 minutes ago

        > I assume you got a spouse or parent do all the laundry for you? I’m not sure you realize how spoiled you sound.

        What a weird accusation. I do this myself, it takes like half an hour a week and is actually quite relaxing.

        I'm not sure you realize how spoiled people sound who would spend thousands of dollars to replace such an insignificant inconvenience.

          skrebbel 5 minutes ago

          At the risk of making yet another wrong assumption, that sounds like you don’t have a family?

          Fwiw laundry takes a pretty significant chunk out of my weekend. I wouldn't spend “thousands of dollars” to reduce it but at around the price of a new phone I’m totally in the market.

      lolakutty 24 minutes ago

      folding laundry is not useful?

        intrasight 15 minutes ago

        Definitely not. I have laundry that I hang. Everything else goes unfolded into sorted bins. Of course it drives my wife crazy, and if she takes my laundry out of the dryer, she folds it. What drives her more crazy is that I proceed to just dump it in the bins.

  • airstrike 30 minutes ago

    I understand why humans get fixated on the nominal threshold of a large, round number like $1B.

    But the thing about private market valuations is that you can't know if investors are right ex ante, so it's helpful to discount.

    A $1B valuation sort of just means you now effectively "owe it" to shareholders, and you're now 100% incentivized to deliver that to them in some form, instead of being fully incentivized to deliver on your true vision to your customer.

    When done well, private diligence can help uncover blind spots and fund company growth in key areas at the service of that true vision.

    When done poorly because of FOMO over AI, robotics, or the latest hype, it can turn into preemptive enshittification.

  • eptcyka an hour ago

    Will this also be a Russian scam?