9 comments

  • hermitcrab 7 minutes ago

    Author of the post here. Github finally took the offending page down approximately 10 minutes after the post appeared on the front page of HN. Total coincidence. I'm sure!

    Moral of the story. If you want even the most basic level of support from Github, you need to get on the front page of HN first.

    And it seems they are able to do things very quickly, when they want to. Bastards.

      ajmurmann 5 minutes ago

      It might not be a willingness issue as much as a bandwidth issue.

        locknitpicker 3 minutes ago

        Yes,evidently bandwidth from HN unblocks takedown requests of malicious content.

        cyanydeez 3 minutes ago

        unwilling to provide proper support?

        Just seems like a silly rational response to the same problem.

  • joshuat 10 minutes ago

    Not exactly the same, but I've noticed a pretty sizable uptick in the number of spam/scam PR comments being left on GitHub (and a longer delay before they're removed after report).

    Not the worst thing in the world, they're easy to spot, but I'd like to see GitHub invest more time in protecting their users from falling victim to these bad actors.

  • jay73763 2 minutes ago

    why would anyone host commercial binary software on github or any other third party domain?

  • kg 9 minutes ago

    In the future just issue a DMCA takedown right away for cases like this, IMO.

  • someonebaggy 11 minutes ago

    If it's your software send a DMCA. They have a legally required timeframe to process those. If it's open source, however, then you don't have any valid DMCA claim.

      93po 6 minutes ago

      Code can be open source while the name and logos are copyrighted and still enforceable via DMCA