16 comments

  • mullingitover 10 minutes ago

    This is great, but I can't help but wonder if we're going to have another post next week with a lab complaining that they were about to publish this same finding, and they had Claude proofread their paper, and whoops how'd that get into Anthropic's training data?

  • aakil 5 minutes ago

    [delayed]

  • iamronaldo 15 minutes ago

    Oh good let's give the ai a wetlab im sure nothing bad will come of this

      jrflo 11 minutes ago

      From the article:

      > All of the lab work is performed by human scientists.

        looperhacks 7 minutes ago

        Not that I agree with the comment you're replying to - but I find this response funny, when just today there was a link on the front page about the US military bombing a school because of AI output

          phoghed 5 minutes ago

          That you clearly only read the headline of

        eleventen 10 minutes ago

        That doesn't mean the humans aren't meat puppets.

      bpodgursky a minute ago

      Biosafety is a very real concern but "lab" is a big bucket, a molecular genetics lab can't synthesize new viruses out of thin air if it's not a virology lab. Sequencers sequence etc. The lab has the equipment it has.

  • eqmvii 11 minutes ago

    In a year or two, articles like this will either be artifacts from peak hype or evidence of the beginning of the singularity. Right?

      pizza234 6 minutes ago

      The singularity, as defined by Hinton (and others) as RSI (Recursive Self Improvement) may actually be beginning already, as OpenAI has announced an AI acting as a "research intern" (!).

      BobbyJo 7 minutes ago

      Yes. I would bet on the latter.

      dude250711 7 minutes ago

      That's black and white thinking; it will be a midgularity - so neither.

  • bonsai_spool 17 minutes ago

    Very cool! However, the amazing absence of results makes me question whether they've got a Nature letter forthcoming or whether they know that another AI lab has a similar finding...