13 points | by jalev an hour ago
4 comments
This is a strange newsletter post. It’s harping against AI but seems AI-written itself.
Its ultimate conclusion:
“I’ve come to the conclusion that a language model is almost always the wrong tool for the job.
I strongly advise against integrating an LLM or chatbot into your product, website, or organisational processes.”
Seems so obviously biased that I can only understand it with the context that the writer is trying to sell their book for $35.
Man I remember back when a psychic conned me by solving the Navier-Stokes problem.
Also >July 4th, 2023
Did an AI do that on its own though? I heard it was human mathematicians using a sophisticated machine as a tool.
All of this is accurate (and useful). But yeah, psychics do not prove theorems from frontier math and build working complex software.
This is a strange newsletter post. It’s harping against AI but seems AI-written itself.
Its ultimate conclusion:
“I’ve come to the conclusion that a language model is almost always the wrong tool for the job.
I strongly advise against integrating an LLM or chatbot into your product, website, or organisational processes.”
Seems so obviously biased that I can only understand it with the context that the writer is trying to sell their book for $35.
Man I remember back when a psychic conned me by solving the Navier-Stokes problem.
Also >July 4th, 2023
Did an AI do that on its own though? I heard it was human mathematicians using a sophisticated machine as a tool.
All of this is accurate (and useful). But yeah, psychics do not prove theorems from frontier math and build working complex software.