5 comments

  • epsteingpt an hour ago

    What political debate is married to the facts? Name one.

  • octotep an hour ago
  • gigatexal an hour ago

    If I was a governor and my state had the resources (land, power, water, people etc) to build a few of these I’d let them. With a few caveats:

    They’d have to be grid neutral. So generate your own power or pay for new generation whatever it is but your data center can’t raise electricity prices.

    Power generation can’t be loud or otherwise environmentally annoying. No extra noise. Smells. Pollution. You gotta find a way to get power without harming the environment.

    Property taxes for the building and such are 5x what they are for any other such building and are binding for 10 years. If you build it in year one and the bust happens and it’s dormant idk the taxes are in escrow and are due us for the next ten years.

    All infra necessary or impacts of it developers have to build and pay for. If you need roads or are gonna impact them to build it then you gotta build alternatives.

    And the water used must be recycled and self sustaining. If you need a million gallons fine but that’s all we can’t have data centers sucking up all the water.

    Do that and you get my blessing.

    I realize these requirements are tall orders but there’s basically infinite money and they’re still far cheaper than space data centers.

      xhkkffbf 21 minutes ago

      Far cheaper? There's free cooling in space. No need to overpay for water or recycle it. There's also free electricity -- once you pay for the solar panels. And there are no property taxes or corporate taxes.

      Given that folks like you think there's infinite money and they can make outrageous demands for taxes, I think it's not obvious that terrestrial centers are "far cheaper".

        jdlshore 11 minutes ago

        > free cooling

        Vacuum is an insulator. I think you may have been mislead.