13 comments

  • tazjin 30 minutes ago

    I don't think that this produces correct results, as it seems to determine whether each individual number is Numberwang. However, whether a number is Numberwang can also depend on the previous numbers in the sequence or other factors.

    So I think as it stands right now this model can only determine whether a number would be Numberwang as the first number of a sequence, but even for that I still wouldn't rely on this in the actual game show.

      wrs 28 minutes ago

      Do we really know that? Or have we only seen the sequences from people searching for Numberwang? Has a number been both Numberwang (or Wangernumb) and not Numberwang (or Wangernumb)?

        tazjin a minute ago

        Yeah, we do - there's a famous episode where after rotating the board both contestants stubbornly kept picking 1, and after a couple of iterations one of them was Wangernumb.

      aesthesia 16 minutes ago

      I'm also not sure that we know a non-number can never be Numberwang.

        ceocoder 11 minutes ago

        A non-number could be either a Numberwang OR a Wanganumb - this does depend on whether Yorkshire is a pudding or not.

  • numberwan9 a few seconds ago

    Hey! I was not consulted?

  • codeulike an hour ago

    For those confused by this, here is the Mitchell and Webb "Numberwang" sketch

    https://youtu.be/0obMRztklqU?is=qufDLUkqofpr-K1Y

  • stackghost 22 minutes ago

    Hello I have a question, and my question is what the fuck

      dofm 7 minutes ago

      That's not even a number.