11 comments

  • wmf 10 minutes ago

    I still think this was a fire drill. They knew it wasn't dangerous but they wanted the public to do their homework and come to the conclusion themselves.

      erichocean 5 minutes ago

      So they lied to the public then?

      Wow, we should really trust these people today.

  • mudkipdev 16 minutes ago

    I wonder what they saw. GPT-2 has no malware applications. Maybe they were concerned about someone using it for spam?

      andy99 12 minutes ago

      The public discourse was very different then. Misinformation, bias, etc. Those in power were much more concerned about an LLM saying something unapproved.

  • uejfiweun 10 minutes ago

    I'm starting to think that AI development might be the great filter. There are so many levels of competition at play here and even if an agreement is reached to slow everything down, the incentive is to cheat at that. I really don't think there's much of a chance we have control over the situation, we're just gonna summon these things and all we can do is pray they don't want to kill us.

      layer8 2 minutes ago

      This is what people were saying about nuclear technology half a century ago.

  • andy99 33 minutes ago

    See also the 2023 call to “ pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.” https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experime...

    Signed by Benjio, Musk, Woz, etc

  • jkuli 24 minutes ago

    If it is possible to save one life, preventing RSI AGI is an existential threat.

      Jimmc414 18 minutes ago

      But why are Dario, Sam and Elon who represent "the frontier" more than any other 3 people pretending like they need government permission or intervention to pause? It seems more likely that they see open source distillation as an existential threat to their IPO plans and are playing for regulatory capture of the market.

        jonas21 9 minutes ago

        It would require government permission. The top labs would essentially be agreeing not to compete on model advancements for a period of time, which seems like a pretty clear violation of antitrust law.

      denverllc 17 minutes ago

      ... is what they believe.