The problem is that even if the majority of labs decide to slow down, there will be one lab, somewhere, with dark money moving forward. The military wouldn't let that chance pass by.
I don't understand. They're slowing the development because they want to or because they have to? Because of ethical concerns? Or because of economics factors that prevent them from delivering results?
Since when have ethical concerns slowed the pace of technology?
> OpenAI said on Wednesday that it was pushing for mandatory national AI safety requirements in the United States, citing concerns that advanced AI systems could accelerate its own development.
The problem is that even if the majority of labs decide to slow down, there will be one lab, somewhere, with dark money moving forward. The military wouldn't let that chance pass by.
> there will be one lab, somewhere, with dark money moving forward
If this is really an existential threat, that's better than fifty of them.
A lot of damage is already done. Go all the way and try and find a cure for cancer or unplug the whole thing.
I don't understand. They're slowing the development because they want to or because they have to? Because of ethical concerns? Or because of economics factors that prevent them from delivering results?
Since when have ethical concerns slowed the pace of technology?
> hey're slowing the development
They're doing no such thing. Altman is saying words ahead of the midterms.
Because some of the people that work at these places have schizophrenia.
I suspect it's all about the last bullet point:
> OpenAI said on Wednesday that it was pushing for mandatory national AI safety requirements in the United States, citing concerns that advanced AI systems could accelerate its own development.
Because it serves as a justification for regulation and government funding.