Apple Watch Ultra 4

58 points | by corvad an hour ago

61 comments

  • pilif 24 minutes ago

    The Ultra 2 was sold to me as the watch that can do Siri without network connectivity. That was very useful to me to leave reminders for stuff I think about while on a run without the phone.

    3 years later, Apple releases the OS 27 versions and Siri got improved to the point where it can’t work on-device any more on said Ultra 2

    So to get the feature back which I paid for and which was specifically used to sell me the device and which now has been taken away from me, I just have to… buy the next hardware generation?

    And how long will that last before they decide to remove the feature again?

    Thankfully, the Ultra 4 provides some other compelling features making this less painful, but I would have expected at least a toggle to keep old Siri on the old watch. New Siri over the network is impossibly slow and buggy (I made the mistake of installing the betas, so there’s no way back now)

  • atomflunder3000 an hour ago

    The first thing they mention is the "great" battery life and it is still only just over 2 days, great.

      bwnkl 31 minutes ago

      The battery life during workout tracking did at least see a 3x improvement. 14 hours sounds plenty at first until you start riding your bike over long distances! 45 hours should cover most except the craziest ultra athletes, and those are probably sponsored by Garmin anyway

        elAhmo 17 minutes ago

        I haven't met anyone who is serious about cycling and not using a real bike computer.

      jsbisviewtiful 42 minutes ago

      Hyperbole is Apple’s favorite communication style, but at this point it’s so overused that it’s just a meaningless meme. Apple’s wearable competitors blow the Apple Watch’s battery life out of the water and it’s not even close. Hyperbole is all Apple has in this race.

        rootusrootus 34 minutes ago

        On the flip side, Apple blows them away on feature set, and often on data accuracy. There is give & take, different priorities for different people.

      brians 43 minutes ago

      Yup. This tells me the AWU is not the adventure watch for me. I love my Apple Watch (8? I think?) and I love my Garmin Instinct Solar with 40d battery life. One of these is for daily wear as a communicator; the other is for weeks in the mountains or offshore.

      jawilson2 26 minutes ago

      My Garmin Venu 4 has 10+ days.

      carabiner 43 minutes ago

      I desperately wish apple would release a viable competitor to the garmin fenix line but they can't with that battery life. Garmin UX and software overall is such dogshit, and to have Apple UX with garmin raw performance (battery life, GPS tracking accuracy, activity modes) would be perfect. Apple could never though because the fenix was designed from the ground up as an embedded device microcontroller, whereas apple watch is a general purpose computer with a GPU.

      psygn89 34 minutes ago

      I bought an Apple Watch recently so I can enter my workplace without much hassle (first world problems). Highly disappointing watch coming from a no-name Amazfit brand. I like my step counter, I don't care whether it's slightly off, I want to see it on my watch face - you'd safely assume it was possible, but no! So now I have to go through multiple menus and swipes to see it and it doesn't even show right away (takes several seconds at times). Don't get me started with the joke that is the battery life.

      Apple Watch is probably Apple's shittiest product today.

        rootusrootus 30 minutes ago

        I take it you are opposed to using non-Apple apps? I show step count on my Apple watch face.

          psygn89 4 minutes ago

          No, I'm not opposed. I got my watch like 2 months ago and haven't really messed with it since. Just baffled that the option doesn't exist. Which app do you use for that and does it affect battery life?

  • ryanschaefer 39 minutes ago

    Had this thought during the presentation. How is the “rewind” feature legal? Don’t a lot of states have laws against making secret recordings?

      danielmarkbruce 22 minutes ago

      You've always been allowed to transcribe (ie, write) out a conversation. Recording is a different thing. A person can always claim, easily and believably, that the transcription is made up. It's just text.

        ryanschaefer 20 minutes ago

        Is that the main differentiator? Not the use of a microphone to create the transcription?

          danielmarkbruce 17 minutes ago

          From a legal perspective you can't record something. Using the microphone, keeping the bits in memory while you turn it into text, probably doesn't meet any reasonable definition of "record".

      alwillis 34 minutes ago

      It doesn't save a recording of someone speaking; it's 15 seconds of a transcription.

        testfrequency 28 minutes ago

        My understanding is it’s E2E transcribed dictation via PCC? Is that not the case?

      Insanity 33 minutes ago

      I guess it was already technically possible with phones though, or hidden tape recorders for something more old-school. Not sure on the legality.

      rootusrootus 35 minutes ago

      Recordings, yes, but this is transcription.

      LeoPanthera 31 minutes ago

      They made it very clear that it doesn't record anything.

        ryanschaefer 26 minutes ago

        If it doesn’t record anything how does it make a transcript? I think some of these laws are strict enough such that no audio recording, even if it’s immediately discarded, is legal.

        But of course, I am not a lawyer.

          danielmarkbruce 16 minutes ago

          People generally don't think of keeping bits in memory for some short period of time as "recording".

  • smeeth an hour ago

    Dear Apple,

    I want to send you my money, but your expensive watch I want to buy is f**ing massive and my wrist is normally sized. I don't really understand why this is still an issue since it's been 4 years.

    Thanks,

    - Guy with slightly below average wrist circumference (40th %ile)

      alistairSH 44 minutes ago

      An "Ultra Mini" with a proper lap button would open my wallet very quickly.

      tiahura 20 minutes ago

      I’m probably 60% and would feel ridiculous wearing one.

  • brandonb an hour ago

    The 4th generation heart rate sensor is quite interesting -- Apple Watch used to sample every ~5 minutes, and now it's every 5 seconds (basically continuous). I think that'll enable a lot of interesting health & wellness use cases.

      skadamat 44 minutes ago

      It's interesting because during workouts, the heart rate sensor samples every 5 seconds but besides that, it was either every 2 or 5 minutes. I'm guessing the battery drain is too much to have it sample every 5 seconds all the time!

      danek_szy 31 minutes ago

      Too bad Apple reserved the [training] Readiness feature only for the Ultra 4 - I'm pretty sure Ultra 3 and probably below are just as well equipped to provide such insight...

  • silksowed 22 minutes ago

    As someone who often backpacks off grid, the features listed are pretty interesting. Anyone have any alternative products this competes with? The "adventure" watch is a new thing for me

  • bilsbie 29 minutes ago

    When are they going to detect blood sugar?

      michelb 24 minutes ago

      When the patent trolls die down and accuracy improves.

  • Dlemlo 37 minutes ago

    $800 for a watch.

    Man we lost it as a society.

    Others are not able to eat, die because of insulin prices, struggle every day and we sit here on HN and people are thinking about buying the next gadget.

    A watch for $800...

      _fw 33 minutes ago
        Dlemlo 20 minutes ago

        This is not a consumer product but a homage to craftmanship and clearly a luxury product.

        Apple is a mass produced product under shitty work conditions.

        jawilson2 25 minutes ago

        Yes, you're correct, billionaires should not exist, and we should keep raising taxes until that is true. The "real" max wealth number is probably a bit lower, but 10 digits of wealth is a good starting point.

      SoftTalker 33 minutes ago

      I understand the sentiment, but you can spend a lot more than that on a watch if you want to, and for a watch that does a lot less. Few people do though, and a lot of people will probably buy the Apple.

      throw1234567891 29 minutes ago

      Glancing at Richard MIlle watches and thinking... $800, peanuts.

      rootusrootus 27 minutes ago

      > die because of insulin prices

      Where does that happen? Even without insurance in America insulin is like 25 bucks a month.

        Dlemlo 19 minutes ago

        Minnesota in 2017, when you search for Alec Smith.

          rootusrootus 12 minutes ago

          A tragic case, and maybe things were different back then. Now, Lilly caps their insulin out-of-pocket costs at $35/month, insurance or not. Walmart has cheap no-insurance insulin, too, I'm not sure if that was true in 2017 though. Alec was trying to ration a much more expensive insulin variant, which definitely sucks, and laws were changed in response to his story.

            1123581321 2 minutes ago

            Walmart has had cheap insulin for decades, and update their formula periodically as patents expire. Not many know about it, though. I've used it when traveling and it works even though it's not as effective as the current prescription insulin.

            Dlemlo 8 minutes ago

            Josh Wilkerson

            And it wasn't just a case.

            And i'm not allowed to reference this?

            I mean i can reference a lot of other things which are still happenin in the USA or do you know want to argue that united states of america takes good care of its people?

      onlyrealcuzzo 33 minutes ago

      You do realize people have been paying tens of thousands for watches for decades, right (and for hand bags, sunglasses, necklaces, rings, etc)?

      $800 is not particularly egregious.

        Dlemlo 9 minutes ago

        And?

        Is this an apple fanboy club and critisism is not allowed or you don't think this critisim is valid because of your strawman argument?

      lab14 34 minutes ago

      How much of your networth have you donated to the starving people? Nature is pretty metal and doesn't care about justice. I thought we all learned this in school.

        Dlemlo 7 minutes ago

        This is not an apple fan club. Someone likes it and comments, i use it to bring up a comment like this.

        Just don't deflect.

        Btw. i'm from a country with a social system soooo

      orf 36 minutes ago

      Insulin shouldn’t be expensive. What’s that got to do with high-end smartwatch pricing?

        Dlemlo 17 minutes ago

        I'm referencing us american people who were unable to afford insulin due to us americans shitty healtcaresystem.

        Search for Alec Smith in Minnesota.

        Its social critic, you did not get that? A country which let their own people die but also make such a product.

        rstupek 27 minutes ago

        Insulin isn't expensive. Walmart sells 100 doses for $77

          Dlemlo 10 minutes ago

          You do understand that this was headlines for years? Did you complelty ignore that?

          It only got 'fixed' 2023 and insulin still costs $30-50 per month for something you need to live.

        SoftTalker 31 minutes ago

        It's more a comment about what we value as a society. An Apple watch is an utterly optional accessory that nobody needs. And yet there's a bubble of rather wealthy people who will buy them without really giving it a second thought, and another large group of people who really can't afford one but will buy it anyway.

          orf 24 minutes ago

          Man that’s so deep - some people are purchasing things while other people cannot purchase said things.

          Society is so screwed :/

            Dlemlo 15 minutes ago

            The social critisism is, that people in the united states of america (were apple is home), let people die while also buying unironically $800 watches as a mass consumer product.

          matchbok3 25 minutes ago

          There's also a bubble of wealthy people who spend their time commenting on HN articles, complaining about .... other wealthy people.

          For what purpose? Virtue signaling?

          throw1234567891 28 minutes ago

          And? People buy what they want to buy. Apple builds what people want to buy. Been like this forever.

            Dlemlo 14 minutes ago

            And? Why do you even the comment on a social critisism comment? Just ignore it, feel happy when you buy yourself the next stupid thing while you feel offended seeing your fellow citicen.

            Why does it even trigger you then?

      jryan49 20 minutes ago

      I mean how often do you buy a watch? Compare with how much do you spend on groceries every month...

        Dlemlo 18 minutes ago

        We can have real arguments, but lets be clear, comparing a $800 dollar watch you use for lisening to music and paying is not the thing to compare to something you actually need to live.

  • nradov 35 minutes ago

    Interesting but the short battery life and 40m (130ft) scuba diving depth limit still make it useless for me.

      anukin 19 minutes ago

      40m diving is more than good for a lot of divers. I am allowed to go on a 30m dive and that’s probably at the 75 percentile of divers.