Todays outage reminded me of some old half-jokes surrounding StackOverflow and the, occasionally measurable, idea that when it goes down, code contributions fall off a cliff. Single prompt to Fable 5.1 later, I had this, a not that well laid out and unpleasant to read prose laden page looking at a few dates vs the affected hours today.
Low effort, really not worth sharing outside the fact I somehow can get even models which produce consistently useable frontend code to make something this poor without even trying, but I was surprised that is seems to be only 7% vs an unaffected Thursday. Given the amount of slop straight merged without reading, I would have expected a lot more to be honest...
Todays outage reminded me of some old half-jokes surrounding StackOverflow and the, occasionally measurable, idea that when it goes down, code contributions fall off a cliff. Single prompt to Fable 5.1 later, I had this, a not that well laid out and unpleasant to read prose laden page looking at a few dates vs the affected hours today.
Low effort, really not worth sharing outside the fact I somehow can get even models which produce consistently useable frontend code to make something this poor without even trying, but I was surprised that is seems to be only 7% vs an unaffected Thursday. Given the amount of slop straight merged without reading, I would have expected a lot more to be honest...