We built Concorde, an open-source framework giving an organization one shared agent that's controlled by a group, rather than just one person.

This is pretty cool because shared agents can bring us closer to single entities doing what took a whole organization to do, kind of moving us in the direction of the trend of the rise of the solo founder.

Saying that entire organisations could be just 1 agent might sound sort of anti-democratic, but this is the reality of where things are already heading.

The "organisation" only exists because humans hold limited context. agents don't have that limit. Corncorde changes that by allowing everyone to interact with the same agent the same way, and it builds a common history.

By making this power structure explicit, we can set up shared agents more intentionally and via guardrails, governance, TEEs, zkml and other tech, we'll get the best of both worlds:

- extreme efficiency and coherence in action from it being one entity

- accountability, transparency, representation of diverse opinions no member owns it, none can reach it privately

Concord is alpha, get in touch if you'd like to launch a shared agent! We also posted an X thread and blog post about it

https://x.com/ShutterNetwork/status/2095090562785587490 https://blog.shutter.network/concorde-a-framework-for-shared... Prior blog post exploring the shared agents space more generally: https://blog.shutter.network/on-shared-agents/

Would be very interested in feedback on where this shared agent model breaks down, compared to other multi agent organizations.

Show HN: Concorde, one AI agent shared by an organization