15 points | by BinRoo 2 hours ago

5 comments

  • cube00 38 minutes ago

    It would be worth clarifying the cost and your intentions with my email address.

    Considering the top level domain is trying to sell a book and you're active about your company on LinkedIn I'd be worried about my email address.

      sajithdilshan 33 minutes ago

      Then don’t put your email address. My gosh, it’s not like he can activate nukes with your email address

  • fxwin 37 minutes ago

    > This course teaches the craft of building practical quantum circuits from scratch.

    Can't wait to have an ion trap in my living room!

    I would love to appreciate the work that is going into this curriculum, but when the lesson overview is overwhelming amounts of AI copy slop I just can't bring myself to be interested.

    Edit: i'm talking about the text, not the pictures. It's not overwhelming in the sense that it is a lot of text, but in the sense that the amount of Claude-isms in relation to both word count and actual content is way too high for me to care about. Take lesson 9 for example:

    9. Where the quantum lives

        every page is a classical drawing
    
        the animation is impossible
    
        each step has a classical model; they refuse to glue
    
        one story per step, no story overall
    
        where the quantum actually lives
    
        and the gap has a price, in coherent memory
    
    
    I have no idea what is going on here or what the topic of this lesson is, and the same is true for like half of the lesson overviews here. Like i said, i'd love to be able to judge the content, but there is none here.
      debo_ 26 minutes ago

      In one minute, I learned they commissioned the art from an actual artist. Calling a few bullet points under each image "overwhelming" is strange. Perhaps get over yourself.