15 comments

  • conception an hour ago

    I don’t even know what to do about LLM authored articles. Do the prompt engineers hitting enter understand it’s difficult to read and off putting? Could HN use a secondary AI tag/flag?

    Sadly I think it’ll be just a dead, poorly written internet moving forward.

    Maybe the article is interesting. I don’t know. It’s exhausting to read.

      evmar an hour ago

      Totally agree. I saw the idea of “Internet Kessler syndrome” recently and I can’t stop thinking about how it captures this.

  • fwlr an hour ago

    If you want to read something interesting and edifying about chess960, the classical starting position, and other interesting starting positions, might I recommend instead this wonderful paper? https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14319

  • pton_xd an hour ago

    Interesting topic but they couldn't be bothered to spend time writing about it, shame.

  • robrenaud an hour ago

    If black and white had different permutations of the back row, you could find more balanced starting positions. Adopt more flexible starting conditions in the computer chess age.

  • mad44 an hour ago

    AI written, and makes no sense it how the piece flows.

      mattbruv an hour ago

      Yep, it was really hard to get my brain to focus on what was actually trying to be conveyed, and I'm a 2000 rated chess player

      mad44 an hour ago

      [flagged]

  • benzible an hour ago

    "The caveats, which are the honest place to start" UGH

  • lavren1974 an hour ago

    Stockfish 15.1

  • StableAlkyne an hour ago

    > Then every setup plays against every other one and earns an honest score.

    ...as opposed to a dishonest score?

  • mattbruv an hour ago

    Claude slop

  • lavren1974 an hour ago

    [dead]

  • 2 hours ago
    [deleted]