This essay's primary assertion is that the use of these cameras likely led to the decline of crime rates. He doesn't offer any credible evidence to support that, and he ignores the evidence that contradicts it.
I find it amusing that he frames anyone who would purchase a baseball cap with an anti-flock message as: "broadcast(ing) their low socioeconomic status"
This essay's primary assertion is that the use of these cameras likely led to the decline of crime rates. He doesn't offer any credible evidence to support that, and he ignores the evidence that contradicts it.
I find it amusing that he frames anyone who would purchase a baseball cap with an anti-flock message as: "broadcast(ing) their low socioeconomic status"
"a report from the company", powerful evidence. As long as the corporation profiting, while their employees spy on you, says it's fine...