Pretty damning remarks from the California AG about Meta: the company knew their products were harmful, they ignored the harms, and they intentionally misled and lied to the public.
It is damning - if true, and if provable in court.
It's a comment to the press after the first day of trial. A comment from a political figure, even. It has to do with optics, nothing more. Both sides try to paint themselves as right to the press and the public. It's about managing public perception, but it has zero to do with what actually happens in the trial.
Pretty damning remarks from the California AG about Meta: the company knew their products were harmful, they ignored the harms, and they intentionally misled and lied to the public.
It is damning - if true, and if provable in court.
It's a comment to the press after the first day of trial. A comment from a political figure, even. It has to do with optics, nothing more. Both sides try to paint themselves as right to the press and the public. It's about managing public perception, but it has zero to do with what actually happens in the trial.