24 comments

  • jeremyberemy 9 minutes ago

    > Police use the technology to investigate crimes such as hit-and-runs and to locate missing persons. > No suspects have been identified.

    Yeah, that tracks.

    > Camera data is owned by the police department and permanently deleted after 30 days.

    I assume this means that the police department deletes one local copy?

      mapotofu 2 minutes ago

      > deletes one local copy.

      I think you’re being a little too generous here.

      gowld 4 minutes ago

      No, Flock plays a semantic game where data on Flock's servers os "owned" by the client, so Flock is not responsible for the content or management of the data.

  • adzm 10 minutes ago

    What alerts are they getting so often anyway? It's a little town of 25k people.

    I can understand the benefit of being able to track coming and going and criminal activity etc but there is no oversight and it is already being abused.

    Keeping this data within the municipality and requiring bureaucracy to coordinate with others might be the best solution I've heard, since it prevents dragnets and builds in auditing as part of the process.

  • nchmy 16 minutes ago

    > Each camera is valued at approximately $3,000, putting the total loss at roughly $24,000. That cost falls directly on the Winona Police Department’s budget.

    Only if they replace them...

      ortusdux 5 minutes ago

      Are they contractually obligated to replace them? IIRC, some municipalities have been covering the cameras with trash bags because they cannot turn them off or remove them until their contract expires.

      monkpit 7 minutes ago

      That would make the loss $48,000 ;)

        thegrim33 4 minutes ago

        Wait until you find out where they get the money from to replace them

      jbs789 3 minutes ago

      Haha I had the same thought.

  • dhosek 3 minutes ago

    One thing I’ve learned from reading accounts of Flock camera thefts is that you shouldn’t do more than one per outing. This sounds like a group arranged to do them all at once which also works.

  • calculatte 10 minutes ago

    So one of the public-private backdoors to erode citizen's rights is being undermined. Such a shame.

  • NDlurker an hour ago

    WINONA, Minn. (Valley News Live) - Every Flock license plate reader camera operated by the Winona Police Department has been sawed off and stolen in what investigators believe was a coordinated theft.

    All eight cameras were taken Aug. 1, according to the Winona Police Department. A patrol officer first noticed the cameras had not sent any alerts in 24 hours. When officers checked the locations, they found the cameras had been cut from their poles and taken. The poles were left behind.

    Two additional Flock cameras on the Mississippi River Bridge, owned by Buffalo County, were also stolen in the same manner.

    Each camera is valued at approximately $3,000, putting the total loss at roughly $24,000. That cost falls directly on the Winona Police Department’s budget.

    The eight WPD cameras were positioned at key highway entry and exit points throughout the city: near Highway 61 and Bundy Boulevard, Highway 43 and Homer Road, Highway 14 and Knapp Valley Drive, and Highway 61 and Highway 14. Two cameras were stationed at each location.

    Flock Safety cameras are automated license plate readers that capture images of plates along with a vehicle’s make, model and color. Police use the technology to investigate crimes such as hit-and-runs and to locate missing persons. Camera data is owned by the police department and permanently deleted after 30 days.

    The thefts are part of a broader national trend. Flock cameras have been vandalized and cut down in communities across the country. The technology has drawn criticism from civil liberties advocates who argue the cameras expand government surveillance and raise concerns about data being shared with third-party companies or federal agencies.

    No suspects have been identified. The investigation is ongoing. Anyone with information is asked to contact the Winona Police Department.

      thomastjeffery 11 minutes ago

      > Police use the technology to investigate crimes such as hit-and-runs and to locate missing persons.

      Disgusting copy. We all know that's not their primary function.

      goatlover 10 minutes ago

      Would be a shame if the public had no such information. /s

      lukan 6 minutes ago

      LLM summary I suppose?

      Who would include "Anyone with information is asked to contact the Winona Police Department." in a HN comment?

        AngryData 2 minutes ago

        Looks like a direct copy from the news site.

        NDlurker 4 minutes ago

        That right there is the FA from the acronym RTFA

        metamet a minute ago

        ...LLM summary?

        If you clicked the link and read the article, you'd quickly realize that they copy/pasted the article into a comment.

  • ryandvm 2 minutes ago

    Curious about the official YCombinator stance on this extremely unpopular YCombinator-backed startup (unpopular here at HN anyway).

  • charcircuit a few seconds ago

    Stealing government property is third world behavior. This should not be tolerated and whatever group is responsible needs to be permanently removed from society to set an example.

  • accountrequired a minute ago

    it is bad to see theft of physical property as a good thing

  • jauntywundrkind a few seconds ago

    Coincidentally, ran into a YouTube short testing how to cut down steel poles quickly yesterday, with battery powered tools.

    Sawzall, 1m 15s, circular saw 1m, circular saw like 20s.

    https://youtube.com/shorts/aAc3Kq0bFPs

    (This would be highly illegal to do and you should not do it, even to evil surveillance cameras that hoover up our lives to terrifying central databases, even if these are ragingly unpopular.)

  • jgbuddy 5 minutes ago

    Find flock cameras near you here! https://maps.deflock.org/