23 comments

  • toshinoriyagi 22 minutes ago

    They've also announced Qwen3.8-27B being released open-weight next week. Qwen3.6-27B is widely regarded as one of the best local models, especially since nothing else comes close to it, that isn't benchmaxxed, without being significantly larger. If 3.8 truly improves upon it that would be awesome.

  • adi2907 13 minutes ago

    Once OpenAI and Anthropic are public, every such announcement will become a reliable sell signal

  • simonw 25 minutes ago

    > Today, we are officially releasing Qwen 3.8-Max, the most capable model in the Qwen family to date. This also marks the first time we will open-source the weights of a Qwen-Max-class model — the open weights will be released next week.

    I don't understand. That's dated today, but:

    https://twitter.com/alibaba_qwen/status/2078759124914098291

    > Qwen3.8 is launching and going open-weight soon! [...] You don't have to wait to test it. Just now, the Qwen3.8-Max-Preview made its debut on Alibaba’s Token Plan, Qoder, and QoderWork.

    That was on July 19th. I used it to draw this pelican: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/20/afraid-of-chinese-mode...

    So what are they releasing today?

      bloomsa 16 minutes ago

      July 19th post mentions “Max-Preview” vs. today’s post dropping the “Preview”. Unclear what changed if anything though.. Maybe broader availability or it’s a slightly improved checkpoint

      Jowsey 15 minutes ago

      My understanding is that these "preview" models are usually earlier RL checkpoints, and that "official release" happens when they're happy with the training run?

      I believe they mentioned around the preview announcement that they'd be releasing improvements to capability, which I assume means continued training.

      telemaxs 18 minutes ago

      they releasing Max.

  • ddxv 22 minutes ago

    It seems this is the only mention of cost?

    > Qwen3.8-Max comes with the official support for reasoning_effort, which can be used to adjust reasoning depth and control cost:

    > xhigh (default): for complex tasks demanding thorough analysis

    > medium: balancing accuracy and speed

    > low: efficient reasoning optimizing for speed and cost

    I hope this is significantly cheaper. I've been loving Deepseek for it's nearly free usage costs, hard to justify switching from cents per day.

  • luciana1u 6 minutes ago

    the benchmark I trust most is whether the model can explain its own pricing page without getting confused

  • BeriV2 17 minutes ago

    We will eventually need a self evolution benchmark to see where these large models can create recursive solutions that improve

  • wxw 21 minutes ago

    > This also marks the first time we will open-source the weights of a Qwen-Max-class model — the open weights will be released next week.

    Nice!

  • jofzar 25 minutes ago

    Lmao I love their video with the idea that people will be able to do their hobbies while ai does their job.

    Surely Alibaba is leading by example here by reducing work hours per week while keeping pay the same right? Right?

      mlmonkey 22 minutes ago

      That's the thing. Wny are companies like OpenAI/Anthropic/Alibaba/Kimi/Deepseek still hiring SWEs if their models have become so good?

        BetterThanSober 5 minutes ago

        The models are good even by skeptics standard, it's just that evangelists are overselling the capabilities. If you understand the limits of LLMs not using them as a business is shooting yourself in the foot.

        However, they are not at the point where they can effectively train themselves, nor did they are capable of researching their own method of learning. SWEs in mid-corps on my country are right now relegated to reviews and sanity check, basically babysitting the LLMs and making sure they're not spouting nonsense. If you think about it, that's basically QA and can also be delegated to another AI. If Bun's rust rewrite that they tout as fully LLM-led can pass the test of time in a year or so I think that's it.

        I believe all that is now constrained by compute and capital, not tech.

        wmf 7 minutes ago

        There's infinite work to be done, so higher productivity makes people worth more. (Obviously this doesn't apply if AI can do everything but we're not there yet.)

        Mythorian 10 minutes ago

        I mean its pretty obvious right? This models are not flawless and sometimes reach stupid conclusions so there needs to be some one who watches it. Thought i must say u are right. Every one of them pretends that this new model is gonna finally take ur jobs lol

  • VladVladikoff 26 minutes ago

    Are these latest Qwen models still open weights or has Qwen moved away from that?

      a2dam 25 minutes ago

      The second sentence of the page: "This also marks the first time we will open-source the weights of a Qwen-Max-class model — the open weights will be released next week."

        VladVladikoff 24 minutes ago

        Page won’t load for me it’s just grey bars fading back and forth forever.

  • choppaface 19 minutes ago

    “self-evolves through feedback loops”

    Does this mean they distilled Claude? Sounds like what Claude Code will often do.

      Art9681 15 minutes ago

      Of course they did.

      charcircuit 10 minutes ago

      It's meaningless. Models have always been able to do this and this capability is strengthened during RL since being able to explore the solution space to figure something out will give it a reward.

      What is important is how long it can go without requiring human intervention. Not just that it's possible to run on its own for a time.