Seems like the right choice to me. Introducing a "reality grounded" image generation feature without very good moderation seems like an obvious miss, and moderation is a tall ask in this context.
Is there actually a genuine use-case for inserting fake things onto maps? I can only see frivolous and disinformation use-cases, but maybe I’m short-sighted.
I don't that is improved with photorealistic satellite pictures. An overhead view is about development layout, which can be done equally well by just drawing geometric shapes.
Seems like the right choice to me. Introducing a "reality grounded" image generation feature without very good moderation seems like an obvious miss, and moderation is a tall ask in this context.
Is there actually a genuine use-case for inserting fake things onto maps? I can only see frivolous and disinformation use-cases, but maybe I’m short-sighted.
There is a use case for visualizing property development, maybe.
I don't that is improved with photorealistic satellite pictures. An overhead view is about development layout, which can be done equally well by just drawing geometric shapes.