3 comments

  • cortesoft 11 minutes ago

    I don't feel like this article really answers the question of why this is the wrong shape. CI takes too long? What else?

    You can make your CI less intensive, that doesn't require a different Github. What features would a 'differently shaped' platform have?

  • socketcluster 17 minutes ago

    This is a good article. I've been working on such infrastructure to facilitate safe vibe coding with a focus on simple access control and analytics. See https://saasufy.com/

    I think this article makes some great points though I'm not sure if GitHub itself is the limiting factor. My view is that the new abstractions are yet to be discovered or widely adopted but I'm seeing some clear patterns arise. This is something I spend a lot of time thinking about because the new abstractions must fit within existing paradigms to provide a smooth transition and to overcome trust barriers.

    I think I still have some work on the packaging side. Will likely need to narrow down my focus to cater to this new deep tech trend I see coming. I'm kind of waiting for some influencer to invent the right terminology for what I've been working towards so that I can jump on that bandwagon.

    Deep tech trends need to permeate into the business lingo before they can get any traction and to do that, the new abstraction has to prove itself in some influential circles and earn itself a new label/buzzword.

  • philips 36 minutes ago

    This week I created a "clanker" account backed by an LLM agent on GitHub and have been iterating with it on one of my open source projects as if it was just a super fast contributor. And... it has been fine.

    I was expecting it to be awkward or annoying but it just kind of worked. I write issues, I tell the clanker to look at the issues, it generates PRs, I review the PRs and test them.

    I was expecting something to really be a snag this week but I have enjoyed the process and using the tools. And the advantage of using the clanker is I go from issue to PR in a few minutes and don't "page out" my own context of the problem which is not the case usually with an open source contribution.

    I still feel like software needs to move at least at the pace of someone with a vision and taste to test and review which forges like GitHub seems fine at.