5 comments

  • throwuxiytayq 34 minutes ago

    A few years ago a device with similar capabilities would have been the coolest gadget ever; Zuckerberg truly has the remarkable ability to turn to shit anything he touches.

      dabinat 19 minutes ago

      Google Glass was loathed too. Unfortunately Zuckerberg learned the wrong lesson from its failure - that the issue was that people could recognize the glasses and know they were being recorded and not the actual recording itself.

      bigfatkitten 22 minutes ago

      It absolutely would not have received a positive reception at an event like DEF CON. They’ve always had a strict photo policy.

      secretsatan 21 minutes ago

      I don’t think so, google glass set the precedent

      georgemcbay 19 minutes ago

      Google Glass came out in 2013 and got a similar reception.

      Google's device also suffered from making the user look ridiculous, like a gargoyle out of Snow Crash, but at the end of the day most people had the same core issue with it as they have with the Meta glasses which is that people don't like the idea of being filmed in public, especially when the filming is somewhat surreptitious (since you don't have to hold bulky camera gear, or at least a phone-sized device to do it)

      Of course you have the legal right to film people in public spaces in many jurisdictions, but you're likely to be socially ostracized for it (and IMO rightfully so).