Im a GrapheneOS user and I don't care what they want to say about it, what's on my phone is as private as what's in my head, and you can't have that either! If he was smart enough to let the agents type in the pin themselves then they're the ones who wiped the phone, not him.
Im a GrapheneOS user and I don't care what they want to say about it, what's on my phone is as private as what's in my head, and you can't have that either! If he was smart enough to let the agents type in the pin themselves then they're the ones who wiped the phone, not him.
> If he was smart enough to let the agents type in the pin themselves then they're the ones who wiped the phone, not him
There are interesting legal and ethical questions involved here. But this argument is silly to the point of making the entire case look silly.
More silly than sending a man to prison for wiping his phone? I think your silly detector may need a firmware update.
This event is excellent advertisement for GrapheneOS and its privacy and security features.
What about if you keep all your secret stuff OFF your phone? Like on a server hosted in more private jurisdiction and encrypted?
Like I'm in USA and I get a server in Cayman Islands or something?
Then on my phone I only ever use my secret-site via incognito from Firefox or somethign?
its a catch22, if your phone looks too sterile, it will be considered suspicious.
you need to keep some salacious texts, maybe some mooning pix, and a shortcut to [chunkybutz.net] so it isnt untypicaly clean.