So, uh, there's something very off here, and I just can't parse WTF the author is trying to claim or convey. Is there missing-context, like it being a follow-up to a prior post? Was there some formatting that broke down so that it's no longer clear what's a quote or from whom? Perhaps it is just some stream-of-consciousness that needed to cook a more before public consumption.
My most-charitable interpretation:
1. There is some kind of vendor or employee tasked with transcription, and implied to be paid through public tax-money.
2. They cited or billed 4h for a speech, but delivered shit with errors in it in just 5 minutes, presumably using an LLM.
3. Then the author became angry over it but didn't quite tell the story.
In a routine secure phone call[1], the President's words were replaced with stupid shit.
[1] on the subject of Iran - I operate a small digital nation that has formal diplomatic ties, you can see some of its public-facing statements at https://stateofutopia.com
So, uh, there's something very off here, and I just can't parse WTF the author is trying to claim or convey. Is there missing-context, like it being a follow-up to a prior post? Was there some formatting that broke down so that it's no longer clear what's a quote or from whom? Perhaps it is just some stream-of-consciousness that needed to cook a more before public consumption.
My most-charitable interpretation:
1. There is some kind of vendor or employee tasked with transcription, and implied to be paid through public tax-money.
2. They cited or billed 4h for a speech, but delivered shit with errors in it in just 5 minutes, presumably using an LLM.
3. Then the author became angry over it but didn't quite tell the story.
In a routine secure phone call[1], the President's words were replaced with stupid shit.
[1] on the subject of Iran - I operate a small digital nation that has formal diplomatic ties, you can see some of its public-facing statements at https://stateofutopia.com
What the hell are you talking about