Tearing up working agreements for petty reasons and later attacking during negotiations for a replacement agreement is certainly stupid but hardly terrorism.
They were known as such way before any of this happening, it's only getting more obvious now. They have quite a track record you need to dig up if you want to make sense of this, not the news for the last three months.
Funny how newspapers so blatantly defend terrorism just to attack the other side they don't like. It's as stupid as it gets.
Tearing up working agreements for petty reasons and later attacking during negotiations for a replacement agreement is certainly stupid but hardly terrorism.
They were known as such way before any of this happening, it's only getting more obvious now. They have quite a track record you need to dig up if you want to make sense of this, not the news for the last three months.
> not the news for the last three months.
I've already alluded to the US withdrawal from the Iran / P5+1 JCPOA in 2018.
Should I go back as far as the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1909, or further back to the 5th millennium BC ?
[dead]
I think the op implied that Trump is fighting terrorism :) Which he is obviously not. He is lining his pockets.