18 comments

  • ThatMedicIsASpy a minute ago

    Am I missing something? I can click the 'article' but its a big picture and a single paragraph. That reads like a picture description.

  • dannyw 16 minutes ago

    > The innocuous appearance of many of the videos raises questions about whether the surveillance was necessary. In one “auto boost/strip”-related call, the drone follows two young men in their car, at least one of whom is described in police records as having been identified as a “suspicious person in a vehicle.” Then the two men emerge onto a basketball court and start playing, and the drone departs.

    https://archive.is/dychh

  • iamnothere 5 minutes ago

    Useful tool mentioned in the article, hadn’t seen this before: https://github.com/lc/gau

  • bobthebob 10 minutes ago

    Helicopters already exist, and so do consumer drones - so why is this an issue?

      inigyou 7 minutes ago

      Scale. The possibility of surveillance was far less worrying when three police officers had to tail you, because they'd only expend that effort when they were pretty sure you'd done a crime.

  • cebert 17 minutes ago

    With mass drone surveillance and online safety acts, we will finally be able to keep our children truly safe for the small cost of privacy.

      _davide_ a few seconds ago

      To balance it, the police need to be extremely accountable, but so far they get away with murder pretty easily...so...

  • kotaKat 10 minutes ago

    And the amazing thing is that DJI was the ones lambasted for their shitty security practices.

    But here we are, with Skydio users openly using public sharing links to their drone feeds 24x7x365 apparently.

    Sounds like another vendor needs to get added to the Covered List, methinks, but the lobbyists won't let that one fly.

      creaturemachine 3 minutes ago

      The only thing insecure was the market position of the domestic competition.

      inigyou 8 minutes ago

      Or rather, lobbyists will let it fly as long as it's got a camera.

  • Simulacra 29 minutes ago

    I remember reading this excellent article on Bloomberg about a guy who started a company that uses Cessna's with high-quality cameras, and they fly over an area for hours, and then use that footage to rollback crimes.

    They filmed everything. There's a video if you can find it where the man shows footage they took of a city in Mexico, where a murder occurred, and how they were able to roll back time and see the murder go down in real time.

    It was really fascinating… In 2016.

    At the time I imagined one day we would have blimps, or long range aircraft circling all major cities 24/7 doing the same thing.

    Instead of planes, they are using drones…

    https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-baltimore-secret-sur...

      bell-cot 4 minutes ago

      Drones are cheap & reliable. Vs. blimps, balloons, and such have repeatedly proven themselves quite fragile.

      pineapplepizza6 25 minutes ago

      An unmanned plane is also called a drone.

  • technewssss an hour ago

    Sad to see. Here in Europe it's definitely not any better. Despite the GDPR’s safeguards, tech surveillance is set to become one of the defining civil liberties battlegrounds in across the World. Even with the EU AI act, the people of europe are significantly at risk.

      easytiger 19 minutes ago

      Wait until you find out what the EU want/have asked the GAM trio of big tech corps to do to your phone and private messaging platforms. (Coincidentally they suddenly don't think so big an anti competition problem exists anymore).

        inigyou 9 minutes ago

        Are you referring to Chat Control 2.0 which has repeatedly failed to pass the Parliament and is illegal to implement today?

  • fortran77 31 minutes ago

    It's nice to see SFPD taking car break-ins seriously.

      malfist 27 minutes ago

      "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"