21 comments

  • aeturnum 13 minutes ago

    Neat! SDRs have been available at reasonable price points for some time but the processing power to engage with wifi and other digital signals has been somewhat elusive. Assuming RAM can be purchased in the future, I think we might see a lot more prosumer-targeted devices for doing raw signal analysis in the future.

  • mmaunder 10 minutes ago

    Historically these have been quickly shut down without much of an explanation.

  • Scene_Cast2 37 minutes ago

    I wonder if this tool can help with EMC compliance testing. My TinySA needs an LNA, so I wonder if this has the required noise floor.

  • kristianpaul 14 minutes ago

    And yet since rtl-sdr times we have passive radars as an option as well https://www.rtl-sdr.com/tag/passive-radar/

  • fiatpandas 27 minutes ago

    The visualizer app reminds me of the same UI / output you get from acoustic cameras.

  • nekusar 6 minutes ago

    The original quote for a single tile was $50-$100

    They came out at $500

    Being off by a bit is fine. Being off by 5x to 10x is.. Yikes.

      rtkwe 3 minutes ago

      Prices have gone a little insane in the last year though too to be fair to them.

      Catloafdev 4 minutes ago

      It looks like it has 4 tiles on it, no?

        nekusar 2 minutes ago

        Yea its mimo 2x2.

        Point still stands that they initially said it would be $50-$100. And its going for $500.

  • tamimio 18 minutes ago

    It should be more specific, it spots RC drones operated on ~5.8ghz, it won’t spot RC on 900mhz, nor cellular enabled ones.

      adolph 10 minutes ago

      Is that a limitation of the antenna? I though QuadRF uses SDR so can see many frequencies, not just the wifi things like ESPARGOS [0]

      From documentation, QuadRF: Operating frequency range of 4.9 - 6.0 GHz (C-Band).

      0. https://espargos.net/

      _davide_ 16 minutes ago

      for lack of directonality?

        relaxing 14 minutes ago

        for lack of frequency tuning

  • AndrewKemendo 12 minutes ago

    > If the open source community can come up with something like this, just imagine what governments are capable of.

    Since ~2022 and accelerated by the Russian aggression against Ukraine, governments are now behind both private and open source for frontier technology.

    The companies that captured government contracts in the last century can’t move fast enough to bring tech into the government and national technology policy and funding is collapsing compared to the private sector

    That’s new in history

      vatsachak 5 minutes ago

      Open source is the future. If everyone can work on it, we get better results for cheaper.

      Open source doesn't mean the end of competition, since we are a competitive species.

      I think the future economy is going to be some sort of UBI + large open source projects

      toomuchtodo 10 minutes ago

      The democratization of asymmetric power and warfare. I cannot opine whether it is a net positive or negative, but it is very cool.

      "The future is already here, it's just not evenly distributed." -- William Gibson

  • ck2 36 minutes ago

    if it can spot/track drones that is a marketing opportunity for airports around the world that have to deal with drone nonsense which shut down flights for days

      bri3d 22 minutes ago

      Most major airports will already have a counter-UAS system, it's a huge industry.

      One big issue with radar is that it has the same problem pilots and human observers do: it struggles to distinguish drones from anything else in the sky (birds, balloons, planes, etc.). This is an active and improving research space, but by and large with radar, when your pilots report a drone, you still don't know how to figure out if it's the typical mis-identification or something real.

      nradov 14 minutes ago

      Yes, primary radar has been useful for detecting airspace incursions since 1939. Nothing new here.

      pixelesque 24 minutes ago

      If would likely need to track them well (not sure from this article/video if that's the case?) to be useful in that scenario...

      Drawing a splodge in roughly the location (not sure if there's range info either? I doubt it if it's passive) overlaid on the video likely won't cut it...

      tamimio 14 minutes ago

      There are more way advanced systems for cuas, where they infuse radar and visual and acoustic plus now AI to minimize the false positives, but practically speaking, they are not bullet proof and still fail. RID (remote ID) is a way to have a cooperative communication and was mandated in US, but there are ways too to spoof it and cloak it.