Not very strong thinking. Falls right into every AI fallacy I know of.
The biggest fallacy is that there's no more value to code or engineering, to use your analogy companies are acting like having good strikers is inconsequential and not worth any investment when you can just use the same striker-bot your opponent uses. "Just being average is good enough for us" is not an attitude held by any winning team.
This itself is an outgrowth of the idea that the world is dead, that everything worth doing is already done, and that humans will soon have little real use. I fucking hate the people spreading that ignorant load of horseshit
Not very strong thinking. Falls right into every AI fallacy I know of.
The biggest fallacy is that there's no more value to code or engineering, to use your analogy companies are acting like having good strikers is inconsequential and not worth any investment when you can just use the same striker-bot your opponent uses. "Just being average is good enough for us" is not an attitude held by any winning team.
This itself is an outgrowth of the idea that the world is dead, that everything worth doing is already done, and that humans will soon have little real use. I fucking hate the people spreading that ignorant load of horseshit
Hey HN!
Started a blog, and the first post is out. Would love to have your thoughts.
A World Cup inspired post on how engineers' position in the org is changing, and how we should adapt as ICs and tech leaders. Quick read.