The military has driven 99% of technical innovation, including the Internet. society usually benefits from this as well.
Aside from the swearing, which kind of took me out of the video, I see no mention of the 'social forces' of the previous administration. If you questioned the 'science', you were fired, de-banked, and censored on the Internet.
We are now allowed to discuss all viewpoints on sites like Twitter.
Anti-science is calling something 'settled' and banning people for even discussing it, when we still have very little understanding of it.
THIS is fascism.
pro-science advocates turn into little dictators when you say something they don't like.
> The military has driven 99% of technical innovation
Where did you get this number?
> I see no mention of the 'social forces' of the previous administration.
The author asks viewers to provide more examples. You can help them by doing just that. I'll be interested too, so you can provide your examples here.
> THIS is fascism.
Do you know that fascism has a definition? More than one definition, really, but not one of them would place an equality sign between bans on Twitter and fascism.
Your unreasonable claim really is a good demonstration why any constructive discussion should be censored, or it would cease to be constructive. It it the reason why I do not discuss anything on twitter. If I do discuss on the Internet, I do it in places where moderators do their job.
The military has driven 99% of technical innovation, including the Internet. society usually benefits from this as well.
Aside from the swearing, which kind of took me out of the video, I see no mention of the 'social forces' of the previous administration. If you questioned the 'science', you were fired, de-banked, and censored on the Internet.
We are now allowed to discuss all viewpoints on sites like Twitter.
Anti-science is calling something 'settled' and banning people for even discussing it, when we still have very little understanding of it.
THIS is fascism.
pro-science advocates turn into little dictators when you say something they don't like.
> The military has driven 99% of technical innovation
Where did you get this number?
> I see no mention of the 'social forces' of the previous administration.
The author asks viewers to provide more examples. You can help them by doing just that. I'll be interested too, so you can provide your examples here.
> THIS is fascism.
Do you know that fascism has a definition? More than one definition, really, but not one of them would place an equality sign between bans on Twitter and fascism.
Your unreasonable claim really is a good demonstration why any constructive discussion should be censored, or it would cease to be constructive. It it the reason why I do not discuss anything on twitter. If I do discuss on the Internet, I do it in places where moderators do their job.