Whats interesting is that this "We don't care about the code, we care about the outcomes" was common management speak for years before AI was on anyone's radar. In some ways it made sense, it was what distinguished your junior programmer from the senior engineer. One worried about the function, the other about how the systems would interact. But it also swept a whole bunch of technical debt and ticking time bombs under the rug. It allowed the ship it quickly and let it be someone elses problem in 2 years when no one can read this garbage, its slow as mud and will require a full rewrite to add one new feature.
AI and its use encouraged use, feels like gasoline poured on that existing mindset.
The tiem that took experienced programmers to hand over their entire development process to AI was so remarkably fast, that it got me to believe that there are almost no programmers that enjoyed solving problems.
Once, my teacher in school told me that a software engineer needs to have some sadasim in it, because it will need to enjoy the pain of being stuck on a problem. I no longer believe this is true.
Most people are in it for the money, the status, the comfortable conditions, or maybe because this is the blue collar of the 21st century.
The people who are in it for the love of the game, are very little.
You also have to consider that the context and the problems you get are very important.
I do not like prompting coding agent at home, and still code as a hobby, but use coding agent extensively at work for various reasons: a feeling like better than good enough is not rewarded mainly.
In the grand scheme of things, programmer might just be an interim profession between when computer was invented and when AI starts programming everything. Future generation problem solvers would just have AI write the programs to solve problems, and probably only a small handful of people in the entire world would understand partially how it works under the hood.
So, the REAL PROBLEM is your assumption: "programmer might just be an interim profession". It's NOT a profession. It's been a hobby for many of us since 90x. And we still like it. If you came to IT to "earn" – please get lost. The place for us, people who like to program by hands, is still here. Just look OpenBSD project.
Whats interesting is that this "We don't care about the code, we care about the outcomes" was common management speak for years before AI was on anyone's radar. In some ways it made sense, it was what distinguished your junior programmer from the senior engineer. One worried about the function, the other about how the systems would interact. But it also swept a whole bunch of technical debt and ticking time bombs under the rug. It allowed the ship it quickly and let it be someone elses problem in 2 years when no one can read this garbage, its slow as mud and will require a full rewrite to add one new feature.
AI and its use encouraged use, feels like gasoline poured on that existing mindset.
The tiem that took experienced programmers to hand over their entire development process to AI was so remarkably fast, that it got me to believe that there are almost no programmers that enjoyed solving problems.
Once, my teacher in school told me that a software engineer needs to have some sadasim in it, because it will need to enjoy the pain of being stuck on a problem. I no longer believe this is true.
Most people are in it for the money, the status, the comfortable conditions, or maybe because this is the blue collar of the 21st century.
The people who are in it for the love of the game, are very little.
You also have to consider that the context and the problems you get are very important.
I do not like prompting coding agent at home, and still code as a hobby, but use coding agent extensively at work for various reasons: a feeling like better than good enough is not rewarded mainly.
In the grand scheme of things, programmer might just be an interim profession between when computer was invented and when AI starts programming everything. Future generation problem solvers would just have AI write the programs to solve problems, and probably only a small handful of people in the entire world would understand partially how it works under the hood.
So, the REAL PROBLEM is your assumption: "programmer might just be an interim profession". It's NOT a profession. It's been a hobby for many of us since 90x. And we still like it. If you came to IT to "earn" – please get lost. The place for us, people who like to program by hands, is still here. Just look OpenBSD project.