I'd like to see some benchmarks, especially given that this seems to just be a CLI wrapper. (The EasyOCR code has been copied into the repo but doesn't seem to have been modified.)
As a twitch reaction I’m inclined to agree, but I’ve found the quality of AI generated readmes typically far exceed those created by humans. Yes, some emojis and fluff are to be expected, but also great structure, fully documented CLI arguments, loads of examples and easy to get started guidelines.
It does however indicate that likely the code is also fully or at best partially written by the same LLM.
> 5-10x faster than EasyOCR
I'd like to see some benchmarks, especially given that this seems to just be a CLI wrapper. (The EasyOCR code has been copied into the repo but doesn't seem to have been modified.)
This was completely vibe coded looking at it
I was hoping to find transforms in rust, all i found was a wrapper in rust running python.
How is this faster than EasyOCR if its just a CLI wrapper around it?
I genuinely despise READMEs that are just AI slopped emoji hell. Can we not put some thought and effort into things anymore...?
As a twitch reaction I’m inclined to agree, but I’ve found the quality of AI generated readmes typically far exceed those created by humans. Yes, some emojis and fluff are to be expected, but also great structure, fully documented CLI arguments, loads of examples and easy to get started guidelines.
It does however indicate that likely the code is also fully or at best partially written by the same LLM.
The entire project is just a paralell wrapper for a python library