Well, a popular feature could be one that is wholly designed to protect corporate computers from "valuable" employees themselves.
Plus there's always an unrelated desire to prohibit access to corporate files by malicious intruders.
When it comes to enterprise, what kind of brain-dead executive would settle for these features to be very similar, much less one and the same?
And if the same feature functions for private PC owners by erring on the side of separating them from their data, you're supposed to be aware of your own track record when it comes to number of years of continuous error-free operation.
Plus be able to figure out the difference between enterprise and consumer approaches, and they might just have different needs by default, duh.
Apple is already taking things like this to the bank, meanwhile bitlocker is spreading un-noticed by most consumers and could very well be a landslide if it pops up in a widespread way.
Interestingly, bitlocker has entered without explicit user permission, and now lurks unseen in many "personal" PCs in the way most malicious intruders would like to see their ransomware spread its remote encryption abilities.
Could even be a Microsoft excutive working their way up to being hired by Apple, maybe not so brain-dead after all :\
Making your files inaccessible faster than ever before
Well, a popular feature could be one that is wholly designed to protect corporate computers from "valuable" employees themselves.
Plus there's always an unrelated desire to prohibit access to corporate files by malicious intruders.
When it comes to enterprise, what kind of brain-dead executive would settle for these features to be very similar, much less one and the same?
And if the same feature functions for private PC owners by erring on the side of separating them from their data, you're supposed to be aware of your own track record when it comes to number of years of continuous error-free operation.
Plus be able to figure out the difference between enterprise and consumer approaches, and they might just have different needs by default, duh.
Apple is already taking things like this to the bank, meanwhile bitlocker is spreading un-noticed by most consumers and could very well be a landslide if it pops up in a widespread way.
Interestingly, bitlocker has entered without explicit user permission, and now lurks unseen in many "personal" PCs in the way most malicious intruders would like to see their ransomware spread its remote encryption abilities.
Could even be a Microsoft excutive working their way up to being hired by Apple, maybe not so brain-dead after all :\
BitLocker with TEE would be nice.