If an employee makes a mistake, we coach them. If an AI makes a mistake, we call it "garbage" and delete the chat.
We are currently trapped in a paradox: we want AI to be "humane" enough to offer advice, but we judge its errors with the severity of a broken calculator.
We are interfacing with it via language but judging it via logic.
A piece exploring this ontological gap and why we need to stop looking for perfection and start understanding the "Digital Spirit" we are working with.
If an employee makes a mistake, we coach them. If an AI makes a mistake, we call it "garbage" and delete the chat.
We are currently trapped in a paradox: we want AI to be "humane" enough to offer advice, but we judge its errors with the severity of a broken calculator.
We are interfacing with it via language but judging it via logic.
A piece exploring this ontological gap and why we need to stop looking for perfection and start understanding the "Digital Spirit" we are working with.